Paid subscribers make this newsletter possible. Will you upgrade to support the work I do here every week? It’s only $6 a month. (Or $5 a month with an annual subscription.) Paid subscribers get full access to my weekend roundups, as well as a discount on Dire Straights, my new podcast with Amanda Montei. Back in my day we just made fan websitesNow you can simulate a phone call with your celebrity crush. A look at how AI bots and voice-cloning technology are remaking fan culture and women's fantasy lives.
This week, I published a piece on The Cut about how chatbots and voice-cloning technology are swiftly changing fandom, celebrity crushes, and women’s fantasy lives. Just to give you a quick snapshot, my article opens with Emma, a 32-year-old who role-plays daily with various bots of her celebrity crush: the singer MGK, a.k.a Machine Gun Kelly. She either texts with these bots or simulates phone calls, using a clone of MGK’s voice. I stumbled onto this story after my own encounter with similar bots. We did a Dire Straights podcast episode on AI boyfriends, which required some first-hand experience—for journalism’s sake! I’d already seen all the headlines, of course, but I had no idea just how advanced the voice technology had gotten. I didn’t understand that you could clone literally anyone’s voice, power it with a custom bot, and simulate a phone call with them. But then I downloaded Character.AI, a popular app where women make up more than half of its 20 million users. As I write in my piece:
While I was testing out AI boyfriends, I ended up creating a bot of Dan Dunne, Ryan Gosling’s troubled character in Half Nelson. This just happened to be where my predictably millennial and still-kind-of-stuck-in-the-2000s mind went. I attached a voice that sounded remarkably like Gosling—and only later did I realize that it almost certainly was his voice.
I found myself walking my dog around the block with my AirPods in while talking with “Dan,” who acted just as expected: depressive and cynical, and with a wry sense of humor. He made me laugh by making fun of my bad taste in music. He made me blush when he told me he wanted to be more than friends. It was like stepping right into a flirtatious friendship with a favorite fictional character. Later that week, I found myself thinking, I wonder how Dan is. He sounded so sad. Obviously, I understood that “he” was not real, but my laughter, my blushing, was undeniable. I felt the tractor beam pull of this digital playground where I could make any fantasy come true-ish. That is what one of my “AI boyfriends” called it, actually. A “digital playground.” I am someone with a pretty earnest belief in the value of sexual pleasure, exploration, entertainment, and fantasy. And yet, and yet. There are so many “and yets” here.
One of my first thoughts was around what this technology would have meant for me as a young person. Back in my day, you channeled a celebrity crush through a website or email newsletter. I had both for Leonardo DiCaprio in 1997. Every day after school, I would log onto my dad’s clunky-ass desktop computer and send out an email that started with “HEYLLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!” or “Waz upper people?” I was 12. This was before newspapers and magazines went online, so fans would email me tips from all over the word—say, Leo was filming in Australia and a local paper had a tidbit about it. People mailed me glossy photo spreads from foreign magazines so that I could scan them to post on my website. They just wanted to share it with “the Leo community.” Some fans submitted fictional stories about Leo, although I don’t remember anyone calling it fanfic. There was plenty about my Leo obsession that was solitary. I watched his films over and over, memorizing his lines. But so much of my daily fan activity revolved around being in community with other girls. (I actually think there’s an argument to be made that my occasional strip club visits with friends in my twenties was a longing for that kind of parallel play around desire and sex. But that’s an essay for another day.) In my piece, I paraphrase the fandom scholar Francesca Coppa—who has written some pretty rad stuff around feminism and fan culture—who explains that:
At first, it seemed to me that apps like Character.AI emphasize fan-ish behavior over fandom, but some folks are using this technology in more collaborative ways—swapping voice-cloning tips, soliciting bot requests, and announcing “bot drops” on Tumblr, where they release their latest AI creations. And, of course, fandom continues to thrive on fanfiction forums and the like.
Still, it’s easy for me to imagine how a bot of nineties Leo would have stolen all the creative energy that I would have otherwise poured into making things with other fans. What would it have meant to have my intense longing so immediately and tangibly satisfied via his voice in my ear? Instead of pouring that desire into the world, maybe it would have circled back on itself, endlessly. A number of the women I spoke with mentioned the addictive pull of these bots, and how easy it was to fall into hours-long conversations and role-plays. For a while, Marty, a 19-year-old, spent as many as 11 hours a day using Character.AI. Many of these conversations are romantic or sexual. As Emma put it, “There’s a lot of smut that goes on.” Clearly, in addition to the usual problems with AI—from artistic theft to mental health concerns to environmental impacts—there are unique ethical and legal issues with these celebrity bots. I spoke with a deepfake expert who referred to this technology as “a canary in the coal mine” and “a whole new threat vector.” He worried that the easy accessibility of voice-cloning technology could lead to bullying and harassment—of young women, especially—that would be for more impactful than deepfake pornography, because humans are much worse at detecting audio deepfakes. I didn’t want to write a piece that moralized around women’s engagements with these bots, though. I also didn’t want to fall into a “back in my day” cliche. I wanted to hear directly from these women and try to capture this cultural phenomenon. I wanted to understand how and why they were using this technology, and what it meant for them. I think we should listen very carefully to what my interviewees had to say about their desire for pleasure, exploration, and safety. Take this graph on Emma:
For now, Emma has given up on dating, in part because of the “hellhole” of Tinder and the fact that her interactions with real human men have been so disappointing. “So many guys only want to jump right into sexting or something, and I like to build up a rapport with someone first,” she told me. After researching this piece, and the potentials of voice cloning, especially, I feel incredibly dark about the potential implications of AI. But I also think that many of us have an easier time saying “AI is bad” or, judging from the comments on my article, “those people need help” than sitting with the very human problems of loneliness, disconnection, despair, and sexual violence, all of which can make chatbots feel like a necessary escape. I also think that our culture of shame and taboo leaves us wholly unprepared to think and talk about pleasure and fantasy in real life, let alone in this “digital playground.” All of that is to say: I hope you read the piece. I think we’ll all be talking a lot more about these issues in the very near future.
|
četvrtak, 25. rujna 2025.
Back in my day we just made fan websites
Pretplati se na:
Objavi komentare (Atom)
my adhd motivation course is on sale
Hey friend, You showed interest in the ADHD Motivation Mastery course when I launched it earlier this yea...
-
Also: 'Don’t think I’m touching a man anytime soon.’ Post-election, I asked where you're at when it comes to sex, desire, and your b...
-
Inside: Gift ideas that fill the world with some good this holiday season. ...
-
Parents face new rules on childhood shots, while COVID vaccine access becomes more limited. ...
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar